Saturday, September 12, 2009
Fertilizer Prices Still Struggling
Short term price objective for POT is bearish at $72. With demand lagging this is an area to stay away from. There are rumors of possible takeover as POT does control a large output with respect to potash as a commodity.
Labels:
farm,
fertilizer,
nitrogen,
phosphorous,
potash,
potassium
Monday, September 7, 2009
Potash companies are cheap
Potash prices, like those of many other commodities, dropped off sharply as the recession kicked off. After pushing towards $1000 per tonne a little over a year ago, 2009 has seen potash prices hit lows around the $650 mark. Financing new mining operations is less attractive at these levels, but according to CIBC World Markets analyst Jacob Bout, diversified miners could find attractive values in existing potash operations via acquisition. According to a report in Globe and Mail, prices above $500 per tonne allow for the upgrading of existing potash mines, but financing a new project would require prices up to $1750.
This makes many companies in this area attractive. Although prices have dropped, there is only a matter of time for the world to need to increase the amount of food by applying more fertilizer. There is talk about consolidation and the possibility of a hostile take over with respect to Potash (POT), and this would have to be done at a price much higher than today's price.
This makes many companies in this area attractive. Although prices have dropped, there is only a matter of time for the world to need to increase the amount of food by applying more fertilizer. There is talk about consolidation and the possibility of a hostile take over with respect to Potash (POT), and this would have to be done at a price much higher than today's price.
Saturday, August 15, 2009
Potash is still a buy
I still like this name, as I believe that demand will continue to outstrip production. This is a long term play and very well run.
Friday, February 13, 2009
Reasons Potash looks good
China has recently started a stimulus plan to keep China's growth moving. One of the biggest things their current government is pushing, is self-sufficiency with respect to food. China has experienced a drought, but this does not help China, but most of the drought is in the western part of the country where most of the food is not grown. Even so, they do grow some crops in this region and production should be low. The fertil ground is in the eastern part of the country and most of the crops are grown here because of the wet fertile soil. They will need to purchase more fertilizer this year to increase food production. Since crops like corn are still at very high levels with respect to pricing, it still behoves China to buy more, even if countries like the US don't fertilize as much this year in anticipation of commodity deflation.
With respect to fertilizer, I have seen some moves in the market where gold and potash are trading together. In the case of upcoming hyperinflation towards the end of this year or beginning of next, we could see potash becoming a safehaven with respect to inflation.
With respect to fertilizer, I have seen some moves in the market where gold and potash are trading together. In the case of upcoming hyperinflation towards the end of this year or beginning of next, we could see potash becoming a safehaven with respect to inflation.
Tuesday, February 10, 2009
Fertilizer Earnings will be Huge in upcoming years
When looking at POT and their value as a publicly traded company, I think that many are missing why they are much more valuable then their current valuation. Many believe that the fertilizer stocks have been driven up just like many of the commodity stocks. Commodity stocks have had a run as the dollar has devaluated, but there is one large difference with respect to fertilizer, people have to eat. Food is the a basic necessity such as heat and water and as the world's population increases their intake of meat, it will continue to increase demand for feed which is comprised mostly of corn. The basis against fertilizer is generally ethanol, as it is currently using approximately one-third of the United State's corn crop. Another important factor with respect to many of the agricultural stocks is that they are not the boring stocks of yesterday, but more of a technology play. Look at Monsanto and their Roundup Ready products. The reason farmers use Monsanto's seeds are because they raise yield. This is important, because if you have already maxed out your farmland, the only way to increase your crop is through increasing yield. This is where fertilizer comes into play as its sole purpose is to add nutrients and increase yield. If you look at many of the emerging markets, many of these countries such as China and Brazil have very low yields when compared to the United States and Canada. Fertilizer is composed of three main nutrients, these are nitrogen, phosphorous, and potassium. Looking at POT, they have major production of all three. With respect to Nitrogen, they produce 2% of the world's capacity. They produce 6% of the `world's phosphorous and 22% potash. They are the third largest producer of phosphorous, the second largest producer of nitrogen and number one producer of potash. Nitrogen is produced in approximately 60 countries with production controled 57% by world governments. Phosphorous is produced in approximately 40 countries with 47% of production contoled by governments. Potash is produced in just 12 countries and only 19% is government controled. Potash not only is the number one producer of the world's potash but it also has investments in other major players. It has a 10% investment in the world's sixth largest producer of potash ICL. They have a 21% interest in Sinofert of China, which is the 8th largest producer. APC, the tenth largest producer is 28% owned by POT. Lastly, They have a 32% interest in SQM, the 13th largest producer of potash. The most interesting situation with respect to potash is the worldwide increase in production. Most have heard that POT is increasing production dramatically and doing it within a quicker time frame as they have mines that were shut down when the price of the commodity was not as price effective. When you look at the worldwide increase you see producers are looking at an increased need over a large time frame. The average mine takes five to seven years to get into the production phase while nitrogen takes three and three to four years for phosphate. Mosaic has five mines in the United States and Canada. Their production for 2007 was 7.4 million tonnes, and current capacity today is 9.2 million tonnes as they complete an expansion in early 2007. They plan to increase capacity 5.1 million tonnes by 2020. Only 400 thousand tonnes of capacity will be added by 2010. Agrium's production for last year was 1.73 million tonnes and capacity has reached 2.06 million tonnes. They are planning an upgrade to their current mine to increase production, and also planning a new greenfield mine in Canada. Intrepid produced 790 thousand tonnes of potash in 2007 and have a reported capacity of 870 thousand tonnes. They have reported deteriorating reserves, but are planning increase production by 250 thousand tonnes by 2011. Foreign companies are also adding production. Belaruskali is a state run company. Their production of 8.3 million tonnes last year was generated at full capacity. In 2009 or 2010 they will have a new mine up and running that should increase production by 500 thousand tonnes. They are evaluating a new mine to replace an existing mine that is running low on reserves. Uralkali has had some issues as of late. One of the top producers of potash in the world, they experienced flooding and a sink hole in their #1 mine. Last year they had production of 5.1 million tonnes. This is 100% of capacity. This flooding caused a loss in production of 1 million tonnes. They are currently upgrading the mines #2 and #4 and estimate that these changes will increase production by 1.9 million tonnes by 2010. They will be making a decision some time this year to start a mine #5, and if they decide to progress it should be completed in 2015. No information on how they will progress with mine #1 due to the flooding. Silvinit, like Uralkali, has outdated mines that they are currently upgrading. Last years production was 100% of capacity at 5.5 million tonnes. Last year they bid $1.5 billion for the Perm area in Russia that has an estimated 3 billion tonnes. They received a loan for the same amount to build a new mine that could be running as early as 2016. This mine could increase production by a third. K+S produced 3.8 million tonnes last year and a capacity of 4 million. It is guessed that their production has very little chance for expansion and would guess they would see a decrease in production in the upcoming years. Most of their older mines have been shut except one. Isreal Chemicals had a production of 5.08 million tonnes and capacity of 5.68 million tonnes. Their main mine is expanding and it is estimated that they will increase production by 250 thousand tonnes this year and another 250 thousand tonnes by 2011. The Arab Potash Company produced 1.86 million tonnes last year and has a capacity of 2.03 million tonnes. They have very low cost operations and will complete a 500 thousand tonne expansion by 2009. There is the possibility for a similar 500 thousand exansion also. China has four companies and they produce about 3.1 million tonnes a year. None of this production is for the export market as they have a very difficult time meeting needs within their own country. By 2009, Gelmud Qingfeng Potash Fertilizer will have implemented an increase in production of 700 thousand tonnes per year. They also have projects underway that could add 2.5 million tonnes per year by sometime in 2009-2010. Brazil has two companies Vale and SQM. Vale produced 670 thousand tonnes and has the capacity of 850 thousand tonnes. They should be able to reach production of 100% of capacity soon. This one mine will be depleted by 2015 and they are exploring opportunities to replace production. SQM produced 690 thousand tonnes last year and has capacity of 780 thousand. They invested one billion dollars to increase potash capacity by 250 thousand tonnes per year and 300 thousand potassium nitrate production within the next three years. Production and capacity are looking to be increased in the upcoming year by new greenfield projects. These projects take five to seven years and will have no immediate affect on supply, they only show an approximation of growing demand within that timeframe. Eurochem is possibly going to build a 2.3 million tonne capacity mine in Russia. Paperwork was signed in July of this year to get started. Uzkhimprom has awarded contracts of $124 million to build a 200 thousand tonne per year mine. Also, Russia has auctioned three large deposits. Eurochem was awarded an estimated deposit of 1.167 billion tonnesfor $170 million. Acron was awarded an estimated deposit of 682 million tonnes for $700 million. Lastly, Silvinit won an auction for $1.48 billion for an estimated deposit of 3.074 billion tonnes. In Argentina, Rio Tinto and Vale are both looking to start new projects, but are still evaluating content. Thailand has the possibility of a mine that could produce 1 million tonnes per year, but the mine lacks the characteristics for safety and ore grade. The government just pulled out and feasibility of the projects are being assessed. MagIndustries is planning a 600 thousand tonne mine in the Congo, while BHP Billiton has been granted an exploration license in Ethiopia. Even with this huge projected growth worldwide in potash production, POT is eclipsing the competition. Even if potash demand growth is only 4% current projects just barely meet demand. This year, potash demand is not being met, with Potash Corp's Lanigan increase and Uralkali's, overseas demand is still too great. Growth for 2009's forcast has an estimated 50% from POT alone. 2010 is the first sign of a major project other than POT going on line. Uralkali and Silvinit have production added that will add almost 3 million tonnes. An increase at POT's Cory and PL mines will also add growth. NB adds to POT's growth in 2011 while minor increases abroad have slight changes. 2012 and 2013 are the big story as all five POT projects come on line and again they have over 50% of the increased production for the world. 2013 looks to be the only year of surplus if demand increases at 4% per year. The five past years have seen potash demand growth at 5.6%. POT's production increases will add 9.16 million tonnes over this time frame. All together, including upgrades to current facilities, POT will see production increases of 10.11 million tonnes at a cost of $6.78 billion. Overall, POT will see capacity reach 18 million tonnes. Capital spending will peak in 2010, and then a marked drop off is seen in the to subsequent years following where POT will see the largest increase in net if demand is steady. capacity in 2012 will reach 23 million tonnes. In summary, demand for fertilizer will increase substantially in the upcoming years as increases in demand will drive up pricing. Since most commodity bull runs last 10-15 years there could be an increase of pricing with respect to potash for the next seven years or so. Another thing to remember, is the existing contracts that will be expiring at lower prices and emerging market demand for fertilizer will likely increase as farm land acreages are likely to remain the same with exception of Brazil. The excess capacity that POT is developing will prepare them for an even longer run if there is still increased demand going forward. Even if the ethanol situation is replaced in upcoming years with more hybrids or even liquified natural gas, it seems that increased demand will still need to be met as China's middle class will continue to grow and their current production increases will likely not meet their demand, and India's population growth someday make them the largest country in the world. I believe that POT is not only a good play in the next year, but also should see increases in earnings at least through 2011. Potash does have major control in potash pricing, and they could scale back some of their new mines if commodity pricing decreases.Less
Labels:
agrium,
crops,
fertilizer,
investment,
mosaic,
nitrogen,
phosphorous,
potash,
potassium,
stocks,
trading
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)